Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a score of 86.6 against 81.5. Both devices in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). The Galaxy A50s is an older device than Motorola Moto G 5G, but it's a lot thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. The Galaxy A50s counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G 5G, although it has a smaller camera aperture, they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
Galaxy A50s features just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.