Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. Galaxy A51 is an older phone than the Moto G 5G, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter and much thinner. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, giving you a couple additional features.
Galaxy A51 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch. Galaxy A51 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto G 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A51 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same resolution camera.
The Moto G 5G features longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.