Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G, having a 91.3 score against 81.5. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even when both were only released 3 months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a just a little better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.