Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than Moto G 5G, getting a global score of 91.1 against 81.5. The Galaxy A52s construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G 5G, even though they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52s also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a just a little greater pixels number per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a greater memory to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Moto G 5G has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.