Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a general score of 87.5 against 81.5. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it gives some extra features and performance tweaks. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is an older phone than the Motorola Moto G 5G, but it's lighter and incredibly thinner anyway.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 features a display that's very similar to the display in Motorola Moto G 5G, both of them have a display of the same size, the same pixel density and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Moto G 5G has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A71, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.