Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the Moto G 5G, with a 92.9 score against 81.5. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 10 operating system. Even when Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW and the Moto G 5G were released only a few months apart, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G. They have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a better pixel count in each screen inch and a screen with the same size.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more internal storage capacity. The Moto G 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.