Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10. Although Galaxy Fold is older and heavier than Motorola Moto G 5G, it's design is still way thinner.
Galaxy Fold features a screen that is just as good as the display in Moto G 5G, because although the Galaxy Fold has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better 1536 x 2152 resolution. Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a little better processing power than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Moto G 5G features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also counts with a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.