Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the Moto G 5G, getting a score of 87.7 against 81.5. Although Samsung Galaxy M51 and the Moto G 5G were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is a bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than the Moto G 5G. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Motorola Moto G 5G and Galaxy M51 feature extremely similar screens, and although the Galaxy M51 has a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit worse pixels quantity per screen inch, they both have a screen with the same size. Galaxy M51 features slightly more storage for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy M51 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy M51 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery life than Moto G 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.