Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G 5G's global score of 81.5. Galaxy Note 20's construction is thinner and just a bit lighter than the Moto G 5G, even though both of them were released only 4 months apart. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G. Both have a same size display, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a higher pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto G 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also has higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much more mega pixels back camera. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.