Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than the Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter phone than Moto G 5G, although they were released with only 4 months difference.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger screen and a better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a way better video quality.
The Moto G 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.