Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 general score. Moto G 5G's body is way newer than Samsung Galaxy Note 3's, but it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G 5G has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy Note 3 has a much better looking screen than Moto G 5G, although it has a little bit inferior pixel amount in each inch of display, a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a quite smaller display.
Moto G 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a camera with a much better resolution and a much bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.