Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note 5's general score of 79.3. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G 5G has newer 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. The Motorola Moto G 5G construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than the Galaxy Note 5.
Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G 5G also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster). The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Moto G 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Moto G 5G features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.