Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a score of 81.5 against 80.4. Even though the Moto G 5G is incredibly newer than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is extremely thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit better processing unit than Moto G 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater screen pixels density. The Moto G 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Moto G 5G has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.