Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 score. Both devices we compare here use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G 5G, although it was released only 11 months before.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G 5G. Both have the same count of pixels per screen inch, a same size screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Moto G 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.