Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting an 88.3 score against 81.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older device than Motorola Moto G 5G, but it is incredibly thinner and a lot lighter anyway. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, providing a lot of extra features.
Galaxy S10 features a brighter screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10 features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Moto G 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.