Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with an 89.7 score against 81.5. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite is older than Motorola Moto G 5G, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G 5G. They have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a same size screen. Galaxy S10 Lite features more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.