Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE has a score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 global score. Although the Galaxy S20 FE and the Moto G 5G were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy S20 FE is thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the newer 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, providing the user some extra features and better performance.
Galaxy S20 FE features a little bit better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy S20 FE features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more RAM.
Galaxy S20 FE features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB, the Galaxy S20 FE also has more internal memory capacity. The Moto G 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto G 5G captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G 5G also counts with a larger aperture and a camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.