Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is a little bit better than Moto G 5G's overall score of 81.5. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has newer 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE body is newer, lighter and notably thinner than the Moto G 5G.
The Galaxy S21 FE features just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S21 FE also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Moto G 5G has a much greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Moto G 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.