Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Phantom black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 98.1, which is way better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra body is somewhat thinner but a little heavier than Moto G 5G, and both were released with only 2 months difference. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has 11 version and Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it offers some extra features.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because it has a greater pixels count in each inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Moto G 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Motorola Moto G 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.