Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto G 5G's global score of 81.5. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer device, and it is also extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, so it gives some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a much sharper screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. Galaxy S22 has just a little better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much better videos and photos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Moto G 5G counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.