Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a 95.4 score against 81.5. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G's, but it is also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better looking display than Moto G 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a little larger screen and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a lot better resolution back-facing camera. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra and Moto G 5G feature similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.