Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | -- |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Moto G 5G, getting an 82.6 score against 81.5. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10, providing some extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and much lighter cellphone than Moto G 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a way better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch. The Moto G 5G counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Moto G 5G features better battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity. Galaxy S25 has a superior camera than Moto G 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a back camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.