Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | -- |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.48 ounces | -- |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Moto G 5G, with a overall score of 90.7 against 81.5. These devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, offering some nice extra features. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is extremely lighter and much thinner than Moto G 5G.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Moto G 5G, because it has a quite bigger display, a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. Moto G 5G features a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better video definition.
Motorola Moto G 5G and Galaxy S25 Ultra count with incredibly similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.