Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 general score. Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is much thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G 5G, even when they were released only 8 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a just a bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Moto G 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a camera in the back with much more MP and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 52% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.