Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LTPS | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than Moto G 5G's score of 81.5. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is much heavier but notably thinner than Moto G 5G, and they were released with only a couple months difference. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing unit than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little inferior pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels.
Moto G 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.