Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a 90.6 score against 81.5. Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is noticeably thinner but a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto G 5G, and both were only released with a couple of months difference. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it provides some additional features.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a screen that is very similar to Moto G 5G's display, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Moto G 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.