Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than Xperia Z4v, having an 81.5 score against 78.8. The Moto G 5G construction is incredibly newer than the Xperia Z4v's, but it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G 5G has the newer 10 version and Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
Xperia Z4v features a much more vibrant display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch of display. Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Sony Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra GPU.
The Moto G 5G has just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels. The Moto G 5G has much more storage to install applications and games than Xperia Z4v, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G features a much longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.