Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.4 | 68.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-05-13 | 2018-07-09 |
| 5.11 x 2.59 x 0.46 inches | 5.62 x 2.76 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 170.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 326 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T720 MP1 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 8.04 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2070mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 is slightly better than the Moto G LTE, having a 68.7 score against 62.4. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G LTE has Android 4.4.4 version, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Samsung Galaxy Amp Prime 3's body is extremely newer and way thinner than Moto G LTE's, although it is a bit heavier.
The Moto G LTE features just a little better performance than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Moto G LTE also counts with a GPU. The Motorola Moto G LTE has a much better looking display than Galaxy Amp Prime 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Motorola Moto G LTE also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has a very superior camera than Moto G LTE, because it has a way better 1920x1080 video resolution and a back camera with a much better 8 megapixels resolution. The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 counts with a much better storage to install applications and games than Moto G LTE, because it has 16 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 400 GB.
Galaxy Amp Prime 3 has longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G LTE, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Amp Prime 3 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.