Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 266 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Moto G Power (2021), getting a 92.9 score against 76.5. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Moto G Power (2021), even though both were only released 6 months apart. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little better processing power than Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a better screen pixel density and a quite larger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power (2021), because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Moto G Power (2021) counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power (2021). So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Power (2021), letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.