Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2021-01-14 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 160.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 266 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has an overall score of 85.2, which is better than the Moto G Power (2021)'s general score of 76.5. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is extremely older than Moto G Power (2021), it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a much better looking display than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a greater number of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and better video frame rate.
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) has longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.