Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-04-13 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.42 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Dark Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG BXM-8-256 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a score of 87.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023)'s 74.4 overall score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version and Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023) has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction is a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), although it was released 3 years before.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has an extremely better processor than Moto G Power 5G (2023). Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2023), and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Moto G Power 5G (2023), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Power 5G (2023) features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.