Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.65 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), getting a global score of 80.2 against 71.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 body is thinner and noticeably lighter than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). The Galaxy Note5 features a much better screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a very superior processing power than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022). They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus 5G (2022), although it has a camera in the back with way less MP, they both have the same aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.