Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, with an 85 score against 79.7. Apple iPhone 8's body is a lot lighter and thinner than the Moto G Stylus, although it was released 3 years before. IPhone 8 features a bit better display than Moto G Stylus, although it has a way lower 750 x 1334px resolution, a quite worse pixels quantity in each display inch and a way smaller display.
The Moto G Stylus has a slightly better memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Moto G Stylus features a much longer battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 120% more battery size. The Moto G Stylus captures much better photographs and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments, a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Stylus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone 8, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Stylus, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.