Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus, with an 80.3 score against 79.7. Google Nexus 6P is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but Google managed to make it a little lighter and thinner. Google Nexus 6P features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per display inch.
Google Nexus 6P has a processing unit that's just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Stylus features just a bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Moto G Stylus, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.