Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus, but Google was able to make it somewhat thinner and way lighter anyway. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.