Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 81.3 against 79.7. Even though the Google Pixel XL is incredibly older than Moto G Stylus, it's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel XL has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture, a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, else you can save some money and get the Moto G Stylus, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.