Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than the LG V20, getting a 79.7 score against 77. Moto G Stylus's design is much newer than LG V20's, but it's just a little bit heavier and thicker. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has 4 more cpu cores.
LG V20 features a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs.
The LG V20 features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus counts with improved battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Moto G Stylus, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the LG V20, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.