Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 83.7 score against 79.7. The LG V50 ThinQ is an older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but LG was able to build it a bit lighter and a little thinner. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a way bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto G Stylus and LG V50 ThinQ have quite similar batteries.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.