Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and also extremely newer.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has an incredibly better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel density.
The Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light situations, a back camera with a much higher resolution and better video frame rate.
Moto G Stylus features a little longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.