Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a 79.7 score against 77.9. Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction is incredibly newer and thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a lot better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of display and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Moto G Stylus has a much better storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Although Motorola Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola Moto G Stylus, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.