Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting a general score of 81.2 against 79.7. The Motorola Edge 50 body is much newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Stylus. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11, offering a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit higher 1220 x 2712px resolution, a little bit larger display and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto G Stylus has just a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 features superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.