Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 397 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, having an 84.7 score against 79.7. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Motorola Moto G Stylus comes with Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A32's body has the same thickness than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it's just a little heavier.
The Moto G Stylus features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px and more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A32 counts with a processor that is just as good as Moto G Stylus's CPU, both have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a slightly bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.