Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with an 82.3 score against 79.7. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A60 is older than the Moto G Stylus, it's construction is somewhat thinner and lighter. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
Galaxy A60 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite better pixels density. Galaxy A60 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A60 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Moto G Stylus has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has an 18% greater battery size.
Moto G Stylus captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Moto G Stylus also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.