Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, getting a global score of 84.9 against 79.7. The Galaxy A80 body is older, heavier and a little bit thicker than the Moto G Stylus. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a little better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A80 and Moto G Stylus feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A80 has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Moto G Stylus features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a 48 megapixels back facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Moto G Stylus features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.