Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's body is just a little thinner but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and both were released with only 8 months difference. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with Android 11 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low light situations, they both have the same video frame rate, the same sensor size, a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
Moto G Stylus and Galaxy A90 5G count with extremely similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, they have the same 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.