Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, having a general score of 81 against 79.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy C9 Pro is extremely older than the Moto G Stylus, it's design is a little lighter and way thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Moto G Stylus one, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Moto G Stylus features a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a battery life that is very similar to Moto G Stylus's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.