Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mystic indigo | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, with an 86.5 score against 79.7. Both phones we are comparing here work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Galaxy M31's design is just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than Moto G Stylus, even though they were released only 1 months apart.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy M31 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Moto G Stylus has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Moto G Stylus also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.