Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Aurora black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ, getting an 86.2 score against 83.7. Moto G200 5G's body is extremely newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the LG V50 ThinQ. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a better pixels density. The Moto G200 5G counts with a bit better processing power than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Moto G200 5G has improved battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.