Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Moto G41's 79.1 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is extremely older than Moto G41, it's body is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Moto G41 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better screen than Moto G41, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels number in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G41 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G41 also has 7 more processing cores.
The Moto G41 features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G41 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G41 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G41 counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.