Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aqua Green and Steel Grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the Moto G50, getting a general score of 98 against 75.3. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body has the same thickness than the Moto G50, but it's somewhat heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Moto G50 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with an incredibly better display than Moto G50, because it has a quite larger screen, a much better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has more memory for games and applications than Moto G50, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto G50 and Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G count with quite similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.